Agenda a Chofnodion

Pwyllgor Apelau - Dydd Llun, 14eg Mawrth, 2016 9.00 yb

Lleoliad: Ystafell Pwyllgor 2, - 3 Heol Spilman, Caerfyrddin. SA31 1LE.. Cyfarwyddiadau

Cyswllt: Martin S. Davies 01267 224059

Eitemau
Rhif	eitem
1.	YMDDIHEURIADAU AM ABSENOLDEB Cofnodion: An apology for absence was recieved from Councillor S. Thomas.
2.	DATGAN BUDDIANNAU PERSONOL. Cofnodion: No declarations of interest were received.
3.	LLOFNODI COFNODION CYFARFOD Y PWYLLGOR A GYNHALIWYD AR Y 9FED HYDREF 2015. PDF 295 KB Cofnodion: RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on the 9^th October 2015 be signed as a correct record.
5.	NI DDYLID CYHOEDDI’R ADRODDIADAU SY’N YMWNEUD Â’R MATERION CANLYNOL GAN EU BOD YN CYNNWYS GWYBODAETH EITHRIEDIG FEL Y’I DIFFINIWYD YM MHARAGRAFF 13 O RAN 4 O ATODLEN 12A I DDEDDF LLYWODRAETH LEOL 1972 FEL Y’I DIWYGIWYD GAN ORCHYMYN LLYWODRAETH LEOL (MYNEDIAD AT WYBODAETH) (AMRYWIO) (CYMRU) 2007. OS BYDD Y BWRDD, AR ÔL CYNNAL PRAWF LLES Y CYHOEDD YN PENDERFYNU YN UNOL Â’R DDEDDF, I YSTYRIED Y MATERION HYN YN BREIFAT, GORCHMYNNIR I’R CYHOEDD ADAEL Y CYFARFOD YN YSTOD TRAFODAETH O’R FATH. Cofnodion: UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 100A (4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following item as the report involved the disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 13 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Act (As amended by the Local Government (Access to Information)(Variation) Order 2007), namely Information which is likely to reveal the identity of an individual.
6.	YSTYRIED APEL YN ERBYN DISWYDDO - ADRAN YR AMGYLCHEDD Cofnodion: Following the application of the public interest test it was RESOLVED pursuant to the Act referred to in Minute No. 4 above to consider this matter in private, with the public excluded from the meeting, as it would involve the disclosure of exempt information likely to reveal the identity of an individual. The public interest test in this matter related to the appellant’s name and other personal details, being personal data as defined in Section 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998. The issue to be considered by the Committee was not a matter of public interest. Disclosure of the information in the report would be unfair and run contrary to the appellant’s right to privacy. On balance therefore, the public interest in disclosure was outweighed by the public interest in maintaining confidentiality of the report. The Chair welcomed to the meeting the appellant, his trade union representative, together with the Chief Executive, appointed investigating officer and HR representative and outlined the protocol which would be followed in hearing the appeal (copies of which were circulated at the meeting). The Committee thereupon proceeded to receive evidence from the investigating officer and the appellant’s representative. Both parties were afforded the opportunity of cross-examining the evidence provided and to sum-up, following which they withdrew from the meeting whilst the Committee considered the evidence and representations made. The Committee, having considered all the evidence presented, together with the representations made by, and on behalf of, the appellant and the investigating officer RESOLVED 5.1 that the appeal be dismissed and the decision to dismiss the appellant, confirmed in a letter dated the 16^th February 2016 following a formal Disciplinary Hearing held on the 11^th February, 2016, be upheld; 5.2 that the appellant be advised in writing of the full reasons for the dismissal of the appeal.